Personalized Medicine

  • Read more: A Brief Quantum Medicine Policy Guide

    A Brief Quantum Medicine Policy Guide

    by Mauritz Kop, Suzan Slijpen, Katie Liu, Jin-Hee Lee, Constanze Albrecht & I. Glenn Cohen   I. Introduction: Harnessing Quantum and AI in Precision Medicine The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum technology (QT) in precision medicine promises to revolutionize healthcare by enabling hyper-personalized treatment. Fundamentally, for our purposes, quantum technology leverages unique properties…

  • Read more: Personal Crusades for Public Health

    Personal Crusades for Public Health

    Public health in the U.S. has collapsed. In its place, we are left with an insufficient, impoverished alternative: personal crusades.

    person walking away from a surgical mask lying on the ground.
  • Read more: What’s in a name? Why metaphors matter for genetics research

    What’s in a name? Why metaphors matter for genetics research

    By Mildred K. Cho, PhD In 2017, the US FDA approved a gene therapy for the first time. However, it’s important to remember that the term “gene therapy” has been an optimistic misnomer for nearly 30 years, since the first clinical trial of a gene-based intervention was initiated in 1990.  Although the FDA has now…

  • Read more: Separating sheep from goats- a European view on the patent eligibility of biomedical diagnostic methods

    Separating sheep from goats- a European view on the patent eligibility of biomedical diagnostic methods

    By Timo Minssen New publication on the patentability of biomedical diagnostics out: Abstract: This brief comment complements Dan Burk’s excellent paper ( Dolly and Alice, J Law and the Biosciences (2015), 1–21, doi:10.1093/jlb/lsv042 ) by providing a very brief summary of the European approach regarding patents on medical diagnostic methods. This serves as the basis for…

  • Read more: Patent Law, Expertise, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

    Patent Law, Expertise, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

    By Zachary Shapiro Since its creation in 1982, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has been a magnet for controversy and criticism. While I do not align myself with those critics, it would be foolish to not acknowledge the problems that are present with the CAFC. For instance, for the vast majority…

  • Read more: Patient Empowerment and 23andMe

    Patient Empowerment and 23andMe

    For those interested in the FDA’s decision to regulate 23andMe’s direct-to-consumer genetic testing service, it is worth reading a recent comment in Nature by Robert Green and Nita Farahany.  The piece raises two core objections to the FDA’s decision that deserve further attention. One objection is that the FDA’s decision runs contrary to “the historical trend of patient…