Judicial Opinions

Politics after a SCOTUS decision

By Kevin Outterson Some SCOTUS opinions stir up politics and legislation (think: Roe v Wade). Others tend to end the process. When the Court is interpreting a federal statute, if they get it “wrong” it is of course possible for the elected branches to reverse them. But for some of these issues, political stalemate in…

Published:

By Kevin Outterson

Some SCOTUS opinions stir up politics and legislation (think: Roe v Wade). Others tend to end the process. When the Court is interpreting a federal statute, if they get it “wrong” it is of course possible for the elected branches to reverse them. But for some of these issues, political stalemate in Congress gives the Justices the last word, perhaps for decades.

Which makes the Roberts Court both activist and powerful.

For more, see “Political gridlock empowers US justices” in today’s Financial Times, quoting me.

@koutterson

 

About the author

  • Kevin Outterson

    Kevin Outterson has served as a guest blogger on Bill of Health. Kevin teaches health law and corporate law at Boston University, where he co-directs the Health Law Program. He serves as Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics; faculty co-advisor to the American Journal of Law & Medicine; immediate past chair of the Section on Law, Medicine & Health Care of the AALS; and a member of the Board of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics. Before teaching, Kevin was a partner at two major US law firms.