Global Health

A global treaty is needed for antibiotic resistance

By Kevin Outterson Or so we claim in this month’s WHO Bulletin.  Resistance is a global common pool problem requiring simultaneous action on three fronts: access to effective antibiotics (many more deaths from susceptible bacterial infections currently); conservation (protect and extend the most effective drug class in history through rational use and infection prevention); and innovation (new…

Published:

By Kevin Outterson

Or so we claim in this month’s WHO Bulletin.  Resistance is a global common pool problem requiring simultaneous action on three fronts: access to effective antibiotics (many more deaths from susceptible bacterial infections currently); conservation (protect and extend the most effective drug class in history through rational use and infection prevention); and innovation (new drugs, diagnostics, vaccines and agricultural practices). Providing any one alone is counterproductive over the long term:  access alone will speed resistance; conservation alone denies access and undermines innovation incentives; innovation alone brings more drugs to the market, but without safeguards to prolong their usefulness and to ensure that low income populations have access to these life saving therapies.

See also this Chatham House Members’ Event last Wednesday on how resistance threatens global health security, with audio.

@koutterson

 

About the author

  • Kevin Outterson

    Kevin Outterson has served as a guest blogger on Bill of Health. Kevin teaches health law and corporate law at Boston University, where he co-directs the Health Law Program. He serves as Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics; faculty co-advisor to the American Journal of Law & Medicine; immediate past chair of the Section on Law, Medicine & Health Care of the AALS; and a member of the Board of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics. Before teaching, Kevin was a partner at two major US law firms.