Bioethics

King v. Burwell And A Right To Health Care

By Gregory Curfman Bill of Health contributor Gregory Curfman has a new piece up at the Health Affairs Blog discussing the Supreme Court’s decision in King v. Burwell in the broader context of Americans’ right to care. From the piece: Do Americans have a fundamental right to health care? This oft-debated question is timely given the Supreme Court’s stunning…

Published:

By Gregory Curfman

Bill of Health contributor Gregory Curfman has a new piece up at the Health Affairs Blog discussing the Supreme Court’s decision in King v. Burwell in the broader context of Americans’ right to care. From the piece:

Do Americans have a fundamental right to health care? This oft-debated question is timely given the Supreme Court’s stunning ruling yesterday in King v. Burwell, in which health insurance subsidies on the federal exchange were upheld in a 6-3 decision.

Here I will place the King v. Burwell opinion in the larger context of to what extent Americans are provided a right to care. The Constitution itself does not stipulate a general right to health care, but a patchwork of rights to certain aspects of health care have emerged over time from both constitutional and statutory law.

Read the full piece at the Health Affairs Blog!

 

About the author

  • Greg Curfman

    Dr. Curfman is currently editor in chief of Harvard Health Publications at Harvard Medical School. Previously he was executive director of the New England Journal of Medicine, a position he held for 14 years. In his tenure at NEJM, he founded and currently directed the Perspective section, which focuses on issues at the interface of medicine and society. His work at NEJM played a critical role in driving the national dialogue on health care.