Author

Alex Stein

  • Government Regulation

    Caveat Veterans: Limitations and Repose in Medical Malpractice Actions under FTCA

    By Alex Stein To be able to sue the government under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), an aggrieved person must first present his claim to the appropriate agency within two years of the claim’s accrual.…

    Caveat Veterans: Limitations and Repose in Medical Malpractice Actions under FTCA

  • Patient Care

    Medical Malpractice and Wrongful Death under Maryland’s Statutes of Limitations and Repose

    By Alex Stein On October 18, Maryland’s Court of Appeals has delivered a precedential ruling on the applicability of the state’s limitation and repose statutes to suits for wrongful death that allegedly resulted from medical malpractice.…

    Medical Malpractice and Wrongful Death under Maryland’s Statutes of Limitations and Repose

  • Patient Care

    Oregon’s Unfulfilled Tort Reform

    By Alex Stein Oregon has a statute capping noneconomic damages recoverable in medical malpractice suits at $500,000. The Oregon Supreme Court decided that this cap is unconstitutional insofar as it clashes with a person’s right to…

    Oregon’s Unfulfilled Tort Reform

  • Patient Care

    Medical Malpractice: The “Same Specialty” Requirement in Federal Courts

    By Alex Stein Medical malpractice suits reach federal courts through two channels: diversity and the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The FTCA framework was set up (inter alia) for suits against doctors working at veterans hospitals…

    Medical Malpractice: The “Same Specialty” Requirement in Federal Courts

  • Informed Consent

    Daubert as a Problem for Psychiatrists

    By Alex Stein Most psychiatrists don’t know about it, but the switch from Frye to Daubert in the admission of expert testimony matters for them a lot. Psychiatrists treat patients with second-generation antipsychotics: Zyprexa, Risperdal, Clozaril,…

    Daubert as a Problem for Psychiatrists

  • Doctor-Patient Relationship

    Medical Malpractice Law as a Triumph of Procedure Over Substance

    By Alex Stein When Sir Henry Maine wrote (here, on page 389) that early substantive law was “secreted in the interstices of procedure,” he did not know that he was coining a long-lasting adage. Even less…

    Medical Malpractice Law as a Triumph of Procedure Over Substance

  • Doctor-Patient Relationship

    Using Malpractice Laws to Sabotage Roe v. Wade

    By Alex Stein This method was pioneered by South Dakota and Indiana that set up special “informed consent” requirements for abortion procedures, SDCL § 34-23A-10.1 and IC 16-34-2-1.1. Under these requirements, physicians must tell the pregnant…

    Using Malpractice Laws to Sabotage Roe v. Wade

  • Liability

    Bypassing Damage Caps

    By Alex Stein Damage caps are widespread. A typical cap provision precludes medical malpractice victims from recovering more than a specified sum for pain, suffering and other noneconomic harms. These caps vary between $250,000 (as in…

    Bypassing Damage Caps

  • Patient Care

    The Incentives to Arbitrate Medical Malpractice Disputes

    By Alex Stein In my previous post, I outlined the legal framework for arbitrating disputes over medical malpractice.  Here, I consider whether arbitration is likely to become a forum of choice for doctors and patients. I…

    The Incentives to Arbitrate Medical Malpractice Disputes

  • Doctor-Patient Relationship

    Agreements to Arbitrate Medical Malpractice Claims: Positive Law

    By Alex Stein Can a healthcare provider make an arbitration agreement with patients for resolving future malpractice disputes? This question has no straightforward answer. As an initial matter, one needs to separate individual arbitration agreements between…

    Agreements to Arbitrate Medical Malpractice Claims: Positive Law