Author

Alex Stein

  • Advanced Care & Aging

    Does an Arbitration Clause in a Nursing Home Agreement Preclude Tort Actions Relating to the Resident’s Wrongful Death?

    By Alex Stein Arbitration clauses in nursing home agreements are pretty much standard. Whether such a clause precludes tort actions complaining about the resident’s wrongful death is consequently an important issue.  The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has recently…

    Does an Arbitration Clause in a Nursing Home Agreement Preclude Tort Actions Relating to the Resident’s Wrongful Death?

  • End-of-Life

    Outpatient Psychiatric Treatment: The Duty to Prevent Patient Suicide

    By Alex Stein In Chirillo v. Granicz, — So.3d —- (Fla. 2016), 2016 WL 4493536, the Florida Supreme Court formulated an important rule for psychiatric malpractice cases. Back in 2001, the First District Court of Appeal…

    Outpatient Psychiatric Treatment: The Duty to Prevent Patient Suicide

  • Doctor-Patient Relationship

    Undiagnosed Cancer under Alabama’s Statute of Repose

    By Alex Stein Alabama Code Section 6–5–482(a) that extends to “all actions against physicians, surgeons, dentists, medical institutions, or other health care providers for liability, error, mistake, or failure to cure, whether based on contract or…

    Undiagnosed Cancer under Alabama’s Statute of Repose

  • Health Law Policy

    Medical Malpractice vs. General Negligence under California Law

    By Alex Stein In its recent decision, Flores v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hosp., 369 P.3d 229 (Ca. 2016), the California Supreme Court has sharpened the critical distinction between “medical malpractice” and general negligence. Under California statute, a plaintiff’s ability to…

    Medical Malpractice vs. General Negligence under California Law

  • Doctor-Patient Relationship

    Malpractice, Terminal Patients, and Cause in Fact

    By Alex Stein Any person interested in medical malpractice or torts in general must read the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent decision, Mickels v. Danrad, 486 S.W.3d 327 (Mo. 2016). This decision involved a physician who negligently failed to diagnose the presence…

    Malpractice, Terminal Patients, and Cause in Fact

  • Tort Law

    Tort Reform in Oregon: Constitutional, After All?

    By Alex Stein Three years ago, Oregon’s Supreme Court voided the state’s $500,000 cap on noneconomic damages for medical malpractice for violating the constitutional guarantee that “In all civil cases the right of Trial by Jury…

    Tort Reform in Oregon: Constitutional, After All?