Health Care Finance

  • Read more: How does the Bipartisan Budget Bill change Social Security Disability Benefits?

    How does the Bipartisan Budget Bill change Social Security Disability Benefits?

    By Emma Sandoe On Tuesday, details of the new Bipartisan Budget Bill, a bill negotiated between Congress and the White House, were released. This bill funds the government for two years and extends the debt ceiling, two important budgetary moves Speaker Boehner promised to leave his successor with a clean slate. Less reported is that…

  • Read more: Does FDA Need a Dietary Supplement User Fee Act?

    Does FDA Need a Dietary Supplement User Fee Act?

    By Elizabeth Guo Dietary supplements are dominating headlines these days – and not in a good way. Last Wednesday, Nevada officials found basketball star Lamar Odom unconscious at a brothel after taking cocaine along , a sexual enhancement dietary supplement. That same week, the New England Journal of Medicine released an article finding that dietary…

  • Read more: The Once and Future Cadillac Tax

    The Once and Future Cadillac Tax

    By Emma Sandoe Over the last few weeks, health economists have been defending the often politically friendless “Cadillac Tax.” This policy, as part of the Affordable Care Act, will begin taxing certain generous health insurance plans starting in 2018. Since World War II, the IRS has held that employer-sponsored health insurance should not been taxed,…

  • Read more: Presidential Campaigns Focus on Drug Costs

    Presidential Campaigns Focus on Drug Costs

    By Katherine Kwong Drug prices have become a hot topic on the presidential campaign trail following recent stories such as the sudden spike in price from $13.50 to $750 for the parasitic infection treatment Daraprim. This story is the latest example of a growing number of complaints about steep increases and high prices for many…

  • Read more: Generic Drug Price Increases: Implications for Medicaid

    Generic Drug Price Increases: Implications for Medicaid

    By Rachel Sachs The internet (not just the health policy part of the internet!) is fascinated by today’s New York Times story about dramatic recent increases in the costs of many decades-old drugs.  The story focuses on the case of Daraprim, the standard of care for treating the parasitic infection toxoplasmosis.  Daraprim was recently acquired…

  • Read more: A Circuit Split on Contraceptives Coverage

    A Circuit Split on Contraceptives Coverage

    By Holly Fernandez Lynch Perhaps foreshadowed by the dissent in the 10th Circuit that I wrote about here, the 8th Circuit has now officially launched a circuit split regarding the legal validity of the accommodation that allows modified compliance/objection to the contraceptives coverage mandate.  Unlike the seven other circuits to have considered the question since Hobby…

  • Read more: Fiduciary Duty and the Payer-Provider Relationship

    Fiduciary Duty and the Payer-Provider Relationship

    By Zack Buck Even though the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has set an ambitious goal to move the reimbursement paradigm away from a fee-for-service model for half of all Medicare services by 2018, incentives built into the delivery of American health care that encourage and result in overtreatment remain. One recent illustration…

  • Read more: HHS’ Proposed Anti-Discrimination Regulations: Protective But Not Protective Enough

    HHS’ Proposed Anti-Discrimination Regulations: Protective But Not Protective Enough

    By Elizabeth Guo Last week, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) released a proposed rule implementing section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Section 1557 applies the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to the ACA so that a covered entity cannot discriminate against an individual on the basis…

  • Read more: Doubling Down on Prosecutorial Discretion

    Doubling Down on Prosecutorial Discretion

    By Zack Buck Health care entities should be “on high alert” following the Southern District of New York’s decision in Kane v. Continuum Health Partners that I blogged about here earlier this month. The case, which serves as the first and most consequential interpretation of when an overpayment is “identified” for purposes of False Claims Act…

  • Read more: Clarity for an “Unforgiving” and “Potentially Unworkable” Rule

    Clarity for an “Unforgiving” and “Potentially Unworkable” Rule

    By Zack Buck In a case previously blogged about here, last week, the Southern District of New York denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss in U.S. ex rel. Kane v. Continuum Health Partners, No. 11-2325, in a major decision for health care entities unclear on the parameters of overpayment liability under the False Claims Act (FCA).…