Mental Health

  • Read more: Two Cheers for Corporate Experimentation

    Two Cheers for Corporate Experimentation

    By Michelle Meyer I have a new law review article out, Two Cheers for Corporate Experimentation: The A/B Illusion and the Virtues of Data-Driven Innovation, arising out of last year’s terrific Silicon Flatirons annual tech/privacy conference at Colorado Law, the theme of which was “When Companies Study Their Customers.” This article builds on, but goes…

  • Read more: Bioethicist Art Caplan: Pilots Need Mental Health Screening — And Doctors Do, Too

    Bioethicist Art Caplan: Pilots Need Mental Health Screening — And Doctors Do, Too

    By Arthur Caplan A new piece by contributor Art Caplan on Forbes: The entirely predictable media obsession with the tragedy of the Germanwings jetliner that crashed into the French Alps on March 25 is moving forward full force. The media, especially cable television, love airline disasters. Once German prosecutors revealed that Andreas Lubitz, the pilot at…

  • Read more: The Curious Case of “Mr. Oft”

    The Curious Case of “Mr. Oft”

    by Zachary Shapiro In the course of my year-long project with Petrie-Flom, I am studying the potential impact of neuroimaging techniques on criminal law. During the course of my research, I found a story of an individual whose case presents difficult questions for our conceptions of criminal guilt and responsibility. [1] While this may be…

  • Read more: Despite Federal Law, Some Insurance Exchange Plans Offer Unequal Coverage for Mental Health

    Despite Federal Law, Some Insurance Exchange Plans Offer Unequal Coverage for Mental Health

    By Kelsey Berry One of my previous blogs discussed how potentially discriminatory practices in insurance design may continue to dissuade people with high-cost conditions from enrolling in insurance plans, even in a post-ACA world. Last week, colleagues Haiden A. Huskamp, Howard H. Goldman, Colleen L. Barry and I published new findings in Psychiatric Services on the same issue, except with…

  • Read more: Discrimination, by what yardstick?

    Discrimination, by what yardstick?

    By Kelsey Berry It’s time to talk about discrimination again — this time, in insurance benefit design. A recent study in NEJM by Jacobs and Sommers has coined the term “adverse tiering” to describe the use of drug formularies by insurers “not to influence enrollees’ drug utilization but rather to deter certain people from enrolling…

  • Read more: Studies provide new insights into youth and adolescent concussion

    Studies provide new insights into youth and adolescent concussion

    By Christine Baugh In the past several weeks there have been two studies with important implications for youth and adolescent concussions. They are summarized briefly in this post. Post-Concussion Rest. Thomas and colleagues recently published a study in the journal Pediatrics examining whether standard of care (1-2 days rest) or 5 days of strict rest (both…

  • Read more: Mental Health in Law School – Part II

    Mental Health in Law School – Part II

    By Deborah Cho We’ve come a long way in the area of mental health over the past several years. Notably, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 did great work to place mental health on more equal footing with physical health in the health insurance arena.  Still, there is much work to…

  • Read more: Short-Term Emergency Commitment Laws Require Police to Assess Symptoms of Mental Illness

    Short-Term Emergency Commitment Laws Require Police to Assess Symptoms of Mental Illness

    By Leslie Allen, JD On November 20, 2014, the Public Health Law Research program released a new 50-state dataset analyzing state law governing the short-term emergency commitment process. These laws give law enforcement officers and others the right to involuntarily admit someone into a mental health care facility if they are in danger of harming…

  • Read more: Upcoming Fairness Hearing in NFL Concussion Litigation

    Upcoming Fairness Hearing in NFL Concussion Litigation

    By Christine Baugh On November 19, Judge Anita Brody will hold a fairness hearing in the class action lawsuit of National Football League (NFL) Players v. NFL re: concussion injury. This is one of the final steps toward final approval (or rejection) of the settlement in the case. Before final approval Judge Brody must determine that…

  • Read more: The Constitutional Implications of Ebola: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights In Times of Health Crises

    The Constitutional Implications of Ebola: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights In Times of Health Crises

    Join us for an important public forum: Constitutional Implications of Ebola:Civil Liberties & Civil Rights In Times of Health Crises This public forum addresses the constitutional and public health implications of Ebola response in the United States.  According to state and federal laws, patient information is deemed private and is to be held in strict…