Protecting Consumer Privacy in DTC Tissue Testing
The privatization of next-generation medical technologies, especially in regenerative and precision medicine, further muddies the data-protection waters.

We must take action to make genetic data sharing more secure and increase the public’s perception of its importance and safety.

Scientific research is now effectively prohibited by the majority of genealogy websites’ terms of use.

Health information should not be treated as property. Instead, we should continue to enhance existing regulatory and liability rules to safeguard individual privacy and data security.

By Gali Katznelson A friend and I had been vaguely entertaining the idea of ordering genetic testing kits for some time. Then, Black Friday happened. My friend called me to share that 23andMe was on sale, 50% off, for 1 more hour! Typing our credit card information into Amazon, we tossed around some half-reasoned arguments…
By Richard Epstein Cross-post from PointOfLaw. Richard A. Epstein is a professor of law at NYU Law School, a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, a Senior Lecturer at the University of Chicago and a visiting scholar with the Manhattan Institute’s Center for Legal Policy. His forthcoming book is “The Classical Liberal Constitution,” from Harvard…
Bill of Health blogger Dov Fox was quoted in the recent article “Genetic-testing patent raises concerns about ‘designer babies’.” “‘Some people might say this is in some respects similar to dating websites to the extent you look for traits in somebody you want to have children with,’ said Dov Fox, a law professor at the…