Contraception

  • Read more: “That I Don’t Know”: The Uncertain Futures of Our Bodies in America

    “That I Don’t Know”: The Uncertain Futures of Our Bodies in America

    By Wendy S. Salkin I. Our Bodies, Our Body Politic On March 30, at a town hall meeting in Green Bay, Wisconsin, an audience member asked then-presidential-hopeful Donald J. Trump: “[W]hat is your stance on women’s rights and their right to choose in their own reproductive health?” What followed was a lengthy back-and-forth with Chris Matthews….

  • Read more: Zubik v. Burwell, Part 3: Birth Control Is Not Abortion

    Zubik v. Burwell, Part 3: Birth Control Is Not Abortion

    By Gregory M. Lipper (Read Part 1, Part 2, Part 4, Part 5, and Part 6 of this series) Pay attention to the Supreme Court’s upcoming contraceptive-coverage cases and you’ll hear horror stories from religious-right groups about an “abortion-pill mandate” (here’s ADF and ACLJ). These groups know that contraception is popular and that, to most people, campaigns to block…

  • Read more: “Crisis Pregnancy Center Fighting for Right to Create More Crisis Pregnancies”

    “Crisis Pregnancy Center Fighting for Right to Create More Crisis Pregnancies”

    By Gregory M. Lipper That’s how Tara Murtha describes the lawsuit brought by Real Alternatives and its three (male) employees seeking to enjoin application of the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive-coverage regulations. This lawsuit is different than the ones currently before the Supreme Court: Real Alternatives is not a religious organization, and its employees argue that…

  • Read more: Linda Greenhouse Wins Headline of the Year

    Linda Greenhouse Wins Headline of the Year

    By Gregory M. Lipper “Sex After 50 at the Supreme Court” is the title of today’s Turkey Day column by the peerless Linda Greenhouse. She takes a saucy look at upcoming Supreme Court cases on contraception and abortion and the role of religion in motivating restrictions on reproductive rights and health. Here’s a taste: But…

  • Read more: The Supreme Court and Contraceptive Coverage—Take 2

    The Supreme Court and Contraceptive Coverage—Take 2

    By Gregory M. Lipper Today the Supreme Court granted review in seven challenges to the accommodation offered to those with religious objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage regulations. I won’t rehash my earlier posts about why I (and seven of eight federal appeals courts) think that these challenges, brought under the Religious Freedom Restoration…

  • Read more: RFRA Jumps The Shark: The 8th Circuit Strikes Down the Contraception Accommodation (Part 2)

    RFRA Jumps The Shark: The 8th Circuit Strikes Down the Contraception Accommodation (Part 2)

    By Gregory M. Lipper Thomas Jefferson famously said that “[i]t does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” Note what Jefferson did not say: “my neighbor is entitled to pick my pocket and break my leg, so long…

  • Read more: RFRA Jumps The Shark: The 8th Circuit Strikes Down the Contraception Accommodation (Part 1)

    RFRA Jumps The Shark: The 8th Circuit Strikes Down the Contraception Accommodation (Part 1)

    By Gregory M. Lipper On Thursday, the Eighth Circuit all but assured that major parts of the Affordable Care Act will return to the Supreme Court’s chopping block. This time the issue is whether an accommodation—enabling religious objectors to opt out of offering contraceptive coverage to their employees—itself violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)….

  • Read more: (Final) Reply to Author of Cato Brief in Little Sisters Contraception Case

    (Final) Reply to Author of Cato Brief in Little Sisters Contraception Case

    By Gregory M. Lipper This is the third and (I promise) final installment in my skirmish with Josh Blackman over a brief that he and Cato Institute filed in support of Little Sisters of the Poor’s quixotic challenge to regulations requiring them to fill out a form to obtain an exemption from providing contraceptive coverage to…

  • Read more: A Reply to the Author of Cato’s Brief in the Little Sisters Contraception Case

    A Reply to the Author of Cato’s Brief in the Little Sisters Contraception Case

    By Gregory M. Lipper Josh Blackman has replied to my post criticizing the Cato Institute’s amicus brief (which Josh coauthored) in support of the cert petition in the Little Sisters contraception case. My original post made two arguments: (1) if you take away the nonprofit accommodation, Hobby Lobby no longer supplies a rule of decision,…

  • Read more: Little Sisters: Cato Institute Targets the Affordable Care Act—Yet Again

    Little Sisters: Cato Institute Targets the Affordable Care Act—Yet Again

    By Gregory M. Lipper Fresh off its unsuccessful attempt to gut the Affordable Care Act in King v. Burwell, the Cato Institute is back for more. This time, Cato has filed an amicus brief in support of Supreme Court review in Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. Burwell. This is one of…