A Timeline of Biden’s Pandemic Response, Part 3: We Have the Tools (Sept. – Dec. 2021)
The “tools” stood for individual choices based on personal risk tolerance rather than elements of regulatory frameworks to be pursued by the government.

The “tools” stood for individual choices based on personal risk tolerance rather than elements of regulatory frameworks to be pursued by the government.

The various proposals all have the goal of encouraging early reporting of, and response to, potentially serious disease outbreaks.

Framing vaccination as a way to opt out of the pandemic has helped absolve the Biden administration of its responsibilities to protect the public’s health.

How did we get here? How is our Democratic president — who ran, in part, against Trump’s horrid pandemic response — letting the virus rip?

The COVID-19 pandemic has (yet again) disclosed that the notion of borders resembles a distinct emanation of legal fiction.

The COVID-19 pandemic has blatantly exposed the flaws of the World Health Organization and its International Health Regulations.

We argue that the human right to participation should extend to permanent seats and votes for civil society and affected communities on governance boards.

The prism of the “shared responsibility model” provides an opportunity to consider potential global health governance models for emergency actions.

Tackling the question of how to address the needs for sharing scientific research is fundamental to any pandemic treaty discussion.

Only a legally enforceable framework can ensure that solidarity is matched with reciprocity that is in the global public interest.
