Certainty and Uncertainty in Trans-Intersex Science Politics
We shouldn’t forget that uncertainty introduces questions to grapple with that are essentially good.

We shouldn’t forget that uncertainty introduces questions to grapple with that are essentially good.

Scientific uncertainty does not mean that parents, judges, and legislators lack the information they need to serve the best interests of children.

This symposium reveals uncertainty’s relevance to abortion access, the legality of gender-affirming care, intersex rights, and child custody disputes.

Courts must investigate alleged government justifications to avoid rubber-stamping restrictions that do nothing but harm.

Like many things, preemption is not inherently problematic, but it can become a weapon when used with malintent.

Don’t be fooled by the savior titles and biased “evidence;” these bills are neither compassionate nor protective.

HHS should formally acknowledge that individuals have a legal right to enforce Section 1557 when they experience prohibited health care discrimination.

Price transparency has long eluded the health care industry, but change — fueled by rare bipartisan support — is afoot.

This digital symposium explores recommendations for the Biden/Harris administration’s health policy agenda.

The Biden administration should work with Congress to add clearer nondiscrimination protections to the ACA.
