Taking Data Sharing Seriously: Public Interest and Solidarity as Principles for an International Pandemic Treaty
Only a legally enforceable framework can ensure that solidarity is matched with reciprocity that is in the global public interest.

Only a legally enforceable framework can ensure that solidarity is matched with reciprocity that is in the global public interest.
Either through hard or soft law, there is a strong case to be made in favor of designing positive “rewarding” mechanisms to encourage cooperation.
The use of fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (“FRAND”) terms in the licensing of intellectual property rights could foster cooperation in pandemics.
A pandemic instrument should enhance roles for and communication between regional and global governmental bodies and especially non-governmental actors.
The international community must avoid entrenching in international law a system indifferent to right-to-health core obligations.
The age of hyper-globalization requires global institutions that enable global – collective – responses to contain pandemics worldwide.
As policymakers consider proposals aimed at preventing another pandemic, the integration of the science-policy interface in their design is important.
Multiple entries argue that justice requires going beyond narrow disease surveillance to enhance legal as well as health system preparedness.
By understanding legal obligations in terms of solidarity, states would be guided toward actions that favor collective over individual benefit.