By Gregory M. Lipper Over the weekend, Ted Cruz again lamented the role played by John Roberts in rejecting the plaintiffs’ arguments in King v. Burwell, the recent attempts to undermine the Affordable Care Act in the Supreme Court. After Chief Justice Roberts wrote the Supreme Court’s 6–3 opinion in the case, the emerging narrative…
Guest post by Erin Fuse Brown [Cross-posted from Center for Law, Health and Society Blog] Commentators have been weighing in since the Supreme Court decided it would hear King v. Burwell, the case challenging the ability of millions of Americans to receive subsidies to purchase health insurance on federally operated Exchanges under the ACA. Debate swirls over whether a…
Much attention has been paid recently to the contradicting decisions issued on the Halbig and King cases, which challenged the Obamacare subsidies offered to individuals purchasing insurance on federal exchanges. In a piece for Politico Magazine, Abbe R. Gluck finds a weakness in the Halbig plaintiffs’ arguments, in their own words. As Gluck writes: What’s less known, however, is that in…
By Kevin Outterson My post at TIE: 4.683 million people get tax bills, lose coverage https://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/4-683-million-unanswered-questions-in-halbig/ Also Nick Bagley at TIE: https://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/a-stinging-defeat-for-the-government/ UPDATE: Gov’t wins in the 4th Cir companion case: https://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/the-government-may-have-lost-in-d-c-but-it-just-won-in-the-fourth-circuit/
