The Pathology (and Politics) of Liability Shields
The COVID liability landscape has presented less of a narrative about the development of substantive torts doctrine and more a study in politics.

The COVID liability landscape has presented less of a narrative about the development of substantive torts doctrine and more a study in politics.

Liability exposure encourages precautions through economic incentives rather than administrative agency directives.

Should an employer be held liable if an employee contracts COVID in the workplace and subsequently “takes it home” and infects a family member?

Thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic, what seemed like an antiquated doctrine to be relegated to the age of sparking trains may be steaming back into relevance.

Torts scholars reflect on questions surrounding whether and how entities might be held liable for the harms associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling avoids extending a federal statute limiting pandemic liability into unprecedented areas.

There is an increasing drumbeat of support for an ethical and legal duty for physicians to reinterpret genetic test results.

There are a series of practical reforms that could readily improve the quality of nursing home care.
