The Federal Judiciary Is Broken — But Not for the Reason You Think
While issues of influence affecting Supreme Court Justices attract the most attention, the factors that make Justices targets extend across the entire federal judiciary.
litigation
-
Read more: The Federal Judiciary Is Broken — But Not for the Reason You Think -
Read more: Should Brain Scans Be Used As Evidence in Trademark Litigation? Should Brain Scans Be Used As Evidence in Trademark Litigation?
A neuroscientifically informed consumer confusion test for trademark infringement holds promise for reducing biases and manipulations.
-
Read more: What the Supreme Court’s Expected Ruling on Affirmative Action Might Mean for US Health Care What the Supreme Court’s Expected Ruling on Affirmative Action Might Mean for US Health Care
Affirmative action in higher education may soon be abolished by the Supreme Court. The consequences for the physician workforce may be dire.
-
Read more: The Most Dangerous Branch: A Review of the Supreme Court’s 2021-2022 Term The Most Dangerous Branch: A Review of the Supreme Court’s 2021-2022 Term
A review of key decisions from the Supreme Court’s 2021-2022 term, including rulings on abortion, concealed carry, and regulatory authority.
-
Read more: Vaccine Mandates in the Military: Litigation Over Religious Exemptions Vaccine Mandates in the Military: Litigation Over Religious Exemptions
To date, the military branches have granted very few religious exemptions to the COVID-19 vaccination requirements.
-
Read more: The Bind We’re in — And How the Supreme Court Put Us There The Bind We’re in — And How the Supreme Court Put Us There
It is time to step away from this destructive path where nine unelected individuals can decide our fate.
-
Read more: NFIB v. OSHA and Its Contradiction with the GOP’s Disability Employment Agenda NFIB v. OSHA and Its Contradiction with the GOP’s Disability Employment Agenda
Conservative jurisprudence during the pandemic is at odds with the goal of full, in-person employment.
-
Read more: Who ‘Deserves’ Health, Who ‘Deserves’ Freedom? A Recurrent Divide in SCOTUS Vaccine Mandate Cases Who ‘Deserves’ Health, Who ‘Deserves’ Freedom? A Recurrent Divide in SCOTUS Vaccine Mandate Cases
Many occupational risks, after all, can be framed as universal. If those protections, too, fall, the most vulnerable will, as always, be most vulnerable.
-
Read more: Private Employer Vaccine Mandates in the Courts Private Employer Vaccine Mandates in the Courts
Private employers’ discretion to establish employee vaccine mandates is generally well-accepted. Yet, legal challenges have proliferated.
-
Read more: The Supreme Court’s Rulings on COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates, Explained The Supreme Court’s Rulings on COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates, Explained
The Court drew new and unprecedented lines between the kinds of risks that agencies have power to address through federal regulations.
