Lost Chances

  • Read more: Understanding “Lost Chances to Recover” (and Looney v. Moore)

    Understanding “Lost Chances to Recover” (and Looney v. Moore)

    By Alex Stein My colleague, Professor Tony Sebok, drew my attention to an important recent decision, Looney v. Moore, 2015 WL 4773747 (N.Dist.Ala. 2015, by Chief United States District Judge Karon O. Bowdre). This decision adjudicated a textbook lost-chance case that involved the effects of oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) in premature infants with extremely low birth…

  • Read more: Lost Chances to Recover: An Elaboration

    Lost Chances to Recover: An Elaboration

    By Alex Stein An important development of the lost-chance doctrine recently took place in Rash v. Providence Health & Services, — P.3d —- (Wash.App.Div.3 2014). An 82-year old patient with a critical heart condition was hospitalized to undergo surgery. The patient’s heart condition made her death inevitable, but she managed to prolong her life with the…

  • Read more: Anti-Abortion Practices at Catholic Hospitals as Medical Malpractice

    Anti-Abortion Practices at Catholic Hospitals as Medical Malpractice

    By Alex Stein The New York Times has recently reported about a suit filed by ACLU against the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops for requiring Catholic hospitals to avoid abortion “even when doing so places a woman’s health or life at risk.” The suit unfolds a disturbing story about an 18-week pregnant woman who rushed…

  • Read more: Compensation for a Patient’s Lost Chances to Recover from Illness: A Redux

    Compensation for a Patient’s Lost Chances to Recover from Illness: A Redux

    By Alex Stein Three days ago, Washington’s Court of Appeals issued a decision explaining the state’s Supreme Court precedents that entitle patients wronged by their doctors to recover compensation for their lost chances to recover from illness: Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, 664 P.2d 474 (Wash. 1983), and Mohr v. Grantham, 262 P.3d…

  • Read more: Decrease in the patient’s chances to survive held actionable as a standalone damage in Minnesota

    Decrease in the patient’s chances to survive held actionable as a standalone damage in Minnesota

    By Alex Stein On May 31, 2013, the Supreme Court of Minnesota has delivered an immensely important decision: it recognized as actionable a patient’s increased risk of dying resulting from her doctor’s negligent failure to secure timely diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Dickhoff v. Green, — N.W.2d —, 2013 WL 2363550 (Minn. 2013) This case…