Oregon

  • Read more: Tort Reform in Oregon: Constitutional, After All?

    Tort Reform in Oregon: Constitutional, After All?

    By Alex Stein Three years ago, Oregon’s Supreme Court voided the state’s $500,000 cap on noneconomic damages for medical malpractice for violating the constitutional guarantee that “In all civil cases the right of Trial by Jury shall remain inviolate” (Or. Const., Art. I, § 17, as interpreted in Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc., 987 P.2d 463,…

  • Read more: Medical Malpractice: The New Wave of Constitutional Attacks on Damage Caps

    Medical Malpractice: The New Wave of Constitutional Attacks on Damage Caps

    By Alex Stein About forty-five years ago, tort reforms took off and states have started capping compensation awards for victims of medical malpractice. The plaintiffs bar countered this initiative by raising different constitutional challenges against caps. Those challenges alluded to equal protection, due process, separation of powers, and the general right to a jury trial. Some…

  • Read more: Oregon’s Unfulfilled Tort Reform

    Oregon’s Unfulfilled Tort Reform

    By Alex Stein Oregon has a statute capping noneconomic damages recoverable in medical malpractice suits at $500,000. The Oregon Supreme Court decided that this cap is unconstitutional insofar as it clashes with a person’s right to recover full jury-assessed compensation for injuries recognized as actionable in 1857 when Oregon adopted its constitution. Specifically, it ruled that…