The Patent Trial and Appeal Board Again Survives Supreme Court Review
For the generic drug and biosimilar industries, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc. comes as a relief.

For the generic drug and biosimilar industries, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc. comes as a relief.

How the Court decides United States v. Arthrex will have important implications for patent law and for administrative law more generally.

Three developments may have effects on the use of patents to fend off competition for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

The purpose of the secondary patent filings was to assemble a thicket of patents, 132 in all, to prohibit competition from biosimilar companies.

Competition between telehealth providers spilled into open conflict last month, as incumbent Teladoc filed a patent infringement suit against Amwell.

To secure widespread access to a COVID-19 vaccine, many countries plan to seek refuge in a long-existing strategy: compulsory licensing.

In the high-stakes market for COVID-19 vaccines, it is worth considering what motivates a private firm to relinquish valuable IP rights.

While generic competition is crucial for reducing drug prices, brand-name drug manufacturers can utilize several strategies to delay such competition.

What if you have a great idea for a new technology, but never actually create it, test it, or determine that it works? Is that patentable?

The pandemic makes a stronger case for the need to explicitly incorporate into our legal system a right to repair and supply products in emergencies.
