COVID-19 Policies and Constitutional Violations
During the coronavirus crisis, protesters are right that their liberty has been infringed. But the real cause is insufficient federal public health efforts.

Testing, quarantine and contact tracing were employed to detect and prevent further transmission of the virus. Breach of orders was criminally punishable.

In the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Iceland rolled out an extensive strategy, which has helped the country avoid the most drastic rights restrictions.

Testing, quarantine and contact tracing were employed to detect and prevent further transmission of the virus. Breach of orders was criminally punishable.

On March 18th, the Chilean government resolved, via an executive order, a state of constitutional catastrophe in response to the novel Coronavirus.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Finland began enacting national containment measures on March 16, 2020, after declaring a national state of emergency.

Australia’s COVID-19 measures were rushed out to respond to the rapidly developing pandemic. It is now time to review their effects on civil rights.

The main regulatory avenue that Switzerland’s Federal Council has used in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been federal orders.

Nowhere has a democratic country witnessed such frontal and public quarrel within its own government as in Brazil.

The trust-based Swedish approach to the Corona-crisis — relatively moderate compared to most other countries — has been both hailed and heavily criticized.
