AI’s Ability to Manipulate Decision Making Requires a Moratorium on Its Use in Obtaining Consent for Biomedical Research
The U.S. should ban the use of persuasive AI in human subject research.

The U.S. should ban the use of persuasive AI in human subject research.

What are the implications of a court requiring a doctor to administer a drug they do not believe is medically indicated?

What obligations do researchers have to disclose potentially life-altering incidental findings as they happen in real time?

Obtaining voluntary competent informed consent is a critical aspect to conducting ethical deep phenotyping research.

What data may be considered “actionable” for the physician to disclose to the patient, and how might this be done?

Medical neocolonialism does not exist in a vacuum. It is tied to the presumed expendability of Black life.

Human subjects research has long been plagued by racial inequality. While flagrant abuses have been curtailed, disparities have, unfortunately, persisted.

Almost immediately, there was a public outcry about the possibility that this was an illegal or unethical “research experiment.”

Without minimizing the need for haste, it is important to remain aware of the risks inherent in rushing to treat patients with anything that might work.

Content includes a course in clinical ethics for medical students, with lectures on surrogate decision-making and advance directives.
