The Supreme Court’s Rulings on COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates, Explained
The Court drew new and unprecedented lines between the kinds of risks that agencies have power to address through federal regulations.

The Court drew new and unprecedented lines between the kinds of risks that agencies have power to address through federal regulations.

From this hearing we can anticipate substantial strengthening of an individual state’s ability to resist federal regulation.

A doctrine that essentially allows courts to strike down willy-nilly policies that they deem “major” undermines the federal government’s capacity to govern.

The novel enforcement mechanism behind SB 8 may soon appear in a wide range of legislation, making it more difficult to challenge unconstitutional laws.

For the generic drug and biosimilar industries, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc. comes as a relief.

The Biden administration could use legislative overrides to address any number of incorrect judicial interpretations of federal health laws.
