Can Vaccine Allocation Plans Legally Respond to Racial Disparities?
Can COVID-19 vaccine allocation legally recognize the outsized burden of cases and deaths that racial/ethnic minority communities have borne?

How the Court decides United States v. Arthrex will have important implications for patent law and for administrative law more generally.

In this post, I explore several problematic aspects of the court’s reasoning for rejecting the claims of pay-for-delay and market allocation.

Revocations through the administrative process could undermine the stability of all waivers, but revocations through the CRA would not.

The pandemic has revealed the broader stakes of this campaign — and what it might mean for access to care well after the worst of the pandemic is behind us.

California v. Texas could have profound implications for the standards to which nonprofit hospitals are held.

Although the future of reproductive freedom is uncertain and bleak, we now have the opportunity to thoughtfully move forward.

Nathan Cortez gives a preview of his paper, “The Artifices of Corporate Speech,” which he will present at the Health Law Policy workshop.

In this video, Mary Ziegler gives a preview of her paper, “Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. Wade to the Present.”

2020 has been a notable year for reproductive rights. Watch panelists discuss these recent developments in a new video.
