The SCOTUS Antibody Ruling Has an Uncertain Impact for Drug Makers and Patients
Scholars, analysts, and companies cannot agree on what Amgen v. Sanofi means for patients, drug makers, and innovation.

Scholars, analysts, and companies cannot agree on what Amgen v. Sanofi means for patients, drug makers, and innovation.
SCOTUS revisits enablement, but Amgen v. Sanofi probably won’t transform patent law on its own.
Mapping the growth of U.S. innovation in the life sciences and computing fields from 1976-2021 through publicly available patent data.
While it may not seem controversial to promote honesty before the USPTO, a recent Federal Register Notice goes far beyond requiring candor.
Going forward, practical solutions should focus on scaling up manufacturing and supply, and improving access and affordability.
For the generic drug and biosimilar industries, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc. comes as a relief.
An explanation of the WTO waiver of COVID-19 intellectual property, what the U.S. declaration of support means, and likely effects of the waiver.
How the Court decides United States v. Arthrex will have important implications for patent law and for administrative law more generally.