Access-to-Medicines Activists Demand Health Justice During COVID-19 Pandemic
Activists in the access-to-medicines movement have mobilized to combat the threat of vaccine/therapeutic apartheid during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Activists in the access-to-medicines movement have mobilized to combat the threat of vaccine/therapeutic apartheid during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Going forward, practical solutions should focus on scaling up manufacturing and supply, and improving access and affordability.

For the generic drug and biosimilar industries, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc. comes as a relief.

An explanation of the WTO waiver of COVID-19 intellectual property, what the U.S. declaration of support means, and likely effects of the waiver.

Should a waiver be issued, there is no legal mechanism that can compel the transfer of certain types of know-how or trade secrets.

How the Court decides United States v. Arthrex will have important implications for patent law and for administrative law more generally.

Three developments may have effects on the use of patents to fend off competition for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Are manufacturing method patents warranted intellectual property protections, or groundless obstacles to competition?

In this post, I explore several problematic aspects of the court’s reasoning for rejecting the claims of pay-for-delay and market allocation.

In November 2020, the FDA released its most recent draft guidance for industry on biosimilarity and interchangeability
