Introducing New Contributor Jorge Contreras
Jorge Contreras is joining Bill of Health as a regular contributor. He is a Presidential Scholar and Professor of Law at the University of Utah.
Jorge Contreras is joining Bill of Health as a regular contributor. He is a Presidential Scholar and Professor of Law at the University of Utah.
The pandemic makes a stronger case for the need to explicitly incorporate into our legal system a right to repair and supply products in emergencies.

Our discussion probes broad questions regarding the role of intellectual property in promoting innovation and protecting against fakes during the pandemic.

By Jonathan Darrow This is Part III in a series exploring the history, challenges, and opportunities in the regulation of biosimilars, or biologic medical products that are very similar to already approved biological medicines. Part III considers a path forward in the regulation of biologics. For Part I, click here. For Part II click here.…

By Jonathan Darrow This is Part II in a series exploring the history, challenges, and opportunities in the regulation of biosimilars, or biologic medical products that are very similar to already approved biological medicines. Part II covers some key considerations and factors that impact the biologics market and regulation. For Part I, click here. Reference…

By Jonathan Darrow This is Part I in a series exploring the history, challenges, and opportunities in the regulation of biosimilars, or biologic medical products that are very similar to already-approved biological medicines. This Part briefly covers the history of American regulation of biologics and touches briefly on the European experience. The Biologics Price Competition…

By Govind Persad Imagine a Harvard MBA graduate trying to decide between jobs at Pfizer and at Snapchat. Both are immensely wealthy firms. Many of Pfizer’s products benefit global health. Snapchat’s are at best neutral and may even harm health. Yet many see Pfizer as distinctively culpable for global health deficits. These arguments often depend…

This post is part of our Eighth Annual Health Law Year in P/Review symposium. You can read all of the posts in the series here. Review the conference’s full agenda and register for the event on the Petrie-Flom Center’s website. By Jacob S. Sherkow For this year’s Health Law Year in P/Review, I’ll be talking…

By Adrian Gropper Google’s semi-secret deal with Ascension is testing the limits of HIPAA as society grapples with the future impact of machine learning and artificial intelligence. I. Glenn Cohen points out that HIPAA may not be keeping up with our methods of consent by patients and society on the ways personal data is used.…

By James Love This is a story about U.S. patent number 6,958,335, and how it took more than 18 years for Novartis to acknowledge National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding in a key patent for Gleevec, allowing Novartis to shape the narrative regarding its role in the development of Gleevec, and also to avoid demands…
