Is Preemption the Cure for Healthcare Federalism’s Restrictions on Medication Abortion?
The consequences that result from state bans and restrictions on medication abortion represent just one example of “healthcare federalism.”

The consequences that result from state bans and restrictions on medication abortion represent just one example of “healthcare federalism.”

Strict, early measures did not lead to better control of the disease, in comparison to other countries in the region.

The Supreme Court seems poised to say that the existence of a secular medical exemption to vaccine mandates means a state must offer a religious exemption.

In the post-Dobbs fight to safeguard reproductive healthcare, a new spotlight has been placed on two existing federal laws.

Without a reliable standard of care, COVID-19 tort claims should not see the success achieved in other contagious disease cases.

The Supreme Court of India recently ruled that all women, whether married or not, have equal rights to access abortion up to 24 weeks of gestation.

The COVID liability landscape has presented less of a narrative about the development of substantive torts doctrine and more a study in politics.

Liability exposure encourages precautions through economic incentives rather than administrative agency directives.

Should an employer be held liable if an employee contracts COVID in the workplace and subsequently “takes it home” and infects a family member?

Thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic, what seemed like an antiquated doctrine to be relegated to the age of sparking trains may be steaming back into relevance.
