Brain imaging

  • Read more: New Portable MRI Revolutionizing Brain Research Demands Ethical and Legal Innovation

    New Portable MRI Revolutionizing Brain Research Demands Ethical and Legal Innovation

    by Francis X. Shen, Susan M. Wolf, and Frances Lawrenz The advent of highly portable MRI will transform brain research, but urgently requires ethical and legal guidance. Rather than participants traveling to the MRI scanner, now the scanner can travel to them. This advance could enable research with remote and marginalized communities that have not…

  • Read more: What Should the Future Look Like for Brain-Based Pain Imaging in the Law? Three Eminent Scholars Weigh In

    What Should the Future Look Like for Brain-Based Pain Imaging in the Law? Three Eminent Scholars Weigh In

    By Amanda C. Pustilnik What should the future look like for brain-based pain measurement in the law?  This is the question tackled by our concluding three contributors:  Diane Hoffmann, Henry (“Hank”) T. Greely, and Frank Pasquale. Professors Hoffmann and Greely are among the founders of the fields of health law and law & biosciences. Both…

  • Read more: Neuroimaging as Evidence of Pain: It’s Time to Prepare

    Neuroimaging as Evidence of Pain: It’s Time to Prepare

    By Henry T. Greely The recent meeting at Harvard on neuroimaging, pain, and the law demonstrated powerfully that the offering of neuroimaging as evidence of pain, in court and in administrative hearings, is growing closer. The science for identifying a likely pattern of neuroimaging results strongly associated with the subjective sensation of pain keeps improving….

  • Read more: Emotion and Pain – Beyond “All in Your Head”

    Emotion and Pain – Beyond “All in Your Head”

    By David Seminowicz A potential difficulty, but also an opportunity, relating to using neuroimaging evidence in legal cases arises from the difficulty brain researchers have in separating emotional and physical pain. We know that pain and emotion are tightly linked. In fact, “emotion” is in the very definition of pain. The IASP definition of pain…

  • Read more: Some Optimism on Brains, Pain, & Law – Let’s See What We Can Achieve

    Some Optimism on Brains, Pain, & Law – Let’s See What We Can Achieve

    By Martha Farah Neurolaw includes some fascinating issues that lack any practical legal significance – for example whether we should consider anyone responsible for anything they do, given that all behavior is physically caused by brain processes.  It also includes some legally important issues that lack intellectual juiciness – like regulatory issues surrounding neurotechnology. Thank…

  • Read more: Pain-o-meters: How – and Why – Should We Develop Them?

    Pain-o-meters: How – and Why – Should We Develop Them?

    By Karen Davis The prevalence of chronic pain is staggering.  The Institute of Medicine reported in 2011 that 100 million Americans suffer from chronic pain – more than those with heart disease, cancer and diabetes combined.  The report also highlights that the annual costs for medical care, lost wages and productivity is more than $600B. …

  • Read more: Pain on the Brain: A Week of Guest Posts on Pain Neuroimaging & Law

    Pain on the Brain: A Week of Guest Posts on Pain Neuroimaging & Law

    By Amanda C. Pustilnik This week, the Petrie-Flom Center of Harvard Law School and the Center for Law, Brain & Behavior (CLBB) at Massachusetts General Hospital are hosting a series of posts on how brain imaging can help the law address issues of physical and emotional pain. Our contributors are world leaders in their fields,…