NFIB v. OSHA and Its Contradiction with the GOP’s Disability Employment Agenda
Conservative jurisprudence during the pandemic is at odds with the goal of full, in-person employment.

Conservative jurisprudence during the pandemic is at odds with the goal of full, in-person employment.
Many occupational risks, after all, can be framed as universal. If those protections, too, fall, the most vulnerable will, as always, be most vulnerable.
The Court drew new and unprecedented lines between the kinds of risks that agencies have power to address through federal regulations.
State litigation and legislation has created a landscape of uncertainty surrounding the legal status of the federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
This post reflects on the ethical implications of FDA’s use of its emergency powers, and suggests opportunities for greater accountability moving forward.
The history of EUA involves fundamental questions about the role of public officials, scientific expertise, and administrative norms in times of crisis.
This blog post provides an overview of the FDA’s emergency authorization powers and analyzes the extent of their usage in the COVID-19 pandemic.