The Supreme Court Threatens to Undermine Vaccination Decisions Entrusted to the States
The Supreme Court seems poised to say that the existence of a secular medical exemption to vaccine mandates means a state must offer a religious exemption.

The Supreme Court seems poised to say that the existence of a secular medical exemption to vaccine mandates means a state must offer a religious exemption.

But in the crisis, / immunities rained down, / Tossed freely around like candy at a 4th of July parade

Inefficiencies in negotiating vaccine procurement agreements during COVID-19 could have been attenuated with greater legal preparedness.

There are two key reasons why no-fault compensation is preferable to the regular torts system for handling claims of vaccine harms.

Do airlines have legal obligations to manage the risk of in-flight infections?

Without a reliable standard of care, COVID-19 tort claims should not see the success achieved in other contagious disease cases.

Faculty should not assume that keeping mum about known cases of COVID is legally acceptable.

The COVID liability landscape has presented less of a narrative about the development of substantive torts doctrine and more a study in politics.

Liability exposure encourages precautions through economic incentives rather than administrative agency directives.

Should an employer be held liable if an employee contracts COVID in the workplace and subsequently “takes it home” and infects a family member?
