Emergency Care

  • Read more: Medical Malpractice or General Negligence? A Redux

    Medical Malpractice or General Negligence? A Redux

    By Alex Stein Whether a tort action sounds in “medical malpractice,” as opposed to “general negligence,” or vice versa, is often critical. Medical malpractice actions must satisfy special requirements that include shortened limitations periods, statutes of repose, expert affidavits, and merit certificates. Suits sounding in ordinary negligence need not satisfy those requirements. Filing and prosecuting those…

  • Read more: The “Emergency Room” Doctrine (a.k.a. Doctors’ Virtual Immunity Against Suit)

    The “Emergency Room” Doctrine (a.k.a. Doctors’ Virtual Immunity Against Suit)

    By Alex Stein Under Georgia statute (that exists in other states as well), allegations of medical malpractice “arising out of the provision of emergency medical care in a hospital emergency department or obstetrical unit or in a surgical suite immediately following the evaluation or treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency department” must show “gross…

  • Read more: Medical Malpractice Law as a Triumph of Procedure Over Substance

    Medical Malpractice Law as a Triumph of Procedure Over Substance

    By Alex Stein When Sir Henry Maine wrote (here, on page 389) that early substantive law was “secreted in the interstices of procedure,” he did not know that he was coining a long-lasting adage. Even less did he anticipate that this adage will aptly describe our today’s system of medical malpractice. This system normally requires plaintiffs…

  • Read more: Governmental immunity for EMTs

    Governmental immunity for EMTs

    By Alex Stein According to the recent New York Court of Appeals’ decision—Applewhite v. Accuhealth, Inc., 2013 WL 3185185 (N.Y. 2013)—governmental immunity is a starting point for any inquiry into EMTs’ liability for malpractice. The Court based this immunity on the famous “duty to all is duty to none” principle: in providing a vital emergency…