Monthly Round-Up of What to Read on Pharma Law and Policy
Topics range from issues related to FDA’s approval of aducanumab, to an analysis of the communication of survival data in cancer drug labels.

Topics range from issues related to FDA’s approval of aducanumab, to an analysis of the communication of survival data in cancer drug labels.

To combat the opioid epidemic, we have to understand how regulators failed to protect the public health as the market for prescription opioids grew.

The court held that prohibiting electrical stimulation in some settings, but not others, runs afoul of a “practice of medicine” statutory provision.

Because of differences in how they were tested in clinical trials, it is difficult to make apples-to-apples comparisons for COVID-19 vaccines.

We must take action to make genetic data sharing more secure and increase the public’s perception of its importance and safety.

This post reflects on the ethical implications of FDA’s use of its emergency powers, and suggests opportunities for greater accountability moving forward.

FDA’s approval of aducanumab may run against the bioethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence.

A Biologics License Application, or BLA, is FDA’s standard “full approval” mechanism for biological products, including therapeutics and vaccines.

Patients are understandably desperate, but their needs are best served by following the science, rather than lowering the standards for drugs.
