The Novel Coronavirus and Civil Rights: A Snapshot from Chile
On March 18th, the Chilean government resolved, via an executive order, a state of constitutional catastrophe in response to the novel Coronavirus.

On March 18th, the Chilean government resolved, via an executive order, a state of constitutional catastrophe in response to the novel Coronavirus.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Finland began enacting national containment measures on March 16, 2020, after declaring a national state of emergency.
Australia’s COVID-19 measures were rushed out to respond to the rapidly developing pandemic. It is now time to review their effects on civil rights.
The main regulatory avenue that Switzerland’s Federal Council has used in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been federal orders.
Nowhere has a democratic country witnessed such frontal and public quarrel within its own government as in Brazil.
The trust-based Swedish approach to the Corona-crisis — relatively moderate compared to most other countries — has been both hailed and heavily criticized.
A common feature in emergency times around the world is that more powers are employed by the government and individual rights are curtailed.
Since March 2020, people in Italy have experienced human rights restrictions that are unprecedented in the country’s republican history.