International Pandemic Lawmaking: Conceptual and Practical Issues — Launch Editorial
This symposium was convened to shed light on the inequities and imbalances exposed by global pandemic response.

This symposium was convened to shed light on the inequities and imbalances exposed by global pandemic response.

From the founding era, the Mexican constitution has upheld the value of the rule of law, even in extraordinary circumstances.

COVID-19 highlights the importance of health policy change to socialize communicable disease costs, empower patients, and deregulate.

Among several important themes, the need to regulate the access to clinical data of patients, also called “interoperability,” arises as a major one.

To shake legislation on surprise medical billing loose, the President would need to take a side and expend political capital on a creative solution.

Commenters so far have raised various issues, including concerns about how the waiver would, if granted, impact access to treatment for mental illness.

Growing problems are driven by one overarching institutional factor: a constitutionally unsustainable procedure for decision-making.
