A Brief History of Abortion Jurisprudence in the United States
This brief history of abortion rights and jurisprudence in the United States aims to clarify just what is at stake in Dobbs.

This brief history of abortion rights and jurisprudence in the United States aims to clarify just what is at stake in Dobbs.
The background of the case, the contents of the draft opinion, and potential implications for abortion access and other rights.
In adoption, we rarely consider the constraints on autonomy that often preclude meaningful choice.
To insinuate that it is simple to relinquish a child for adoption diminishes the magnitude of the deep loss for the first/birth mother and the adoptee.
The reimposition of the adoption logic is incompatible with reproductive dignity, safety, and justice, and inimical to human rights.
Anti-abortion advocacy and values consistent with Catholic and other conservative religious ideologies are at the core of safe haven laws.
Relinquishing a child for adoption is an alternative to parenting that child, not to carrying a pregnancy to term.
Justice Coney Barrett’s remarks reveal a cluelessness about the human condition and the meaning of bearing a child and then placing a newborn for adoption.