The Future of Public Health Law Lies in the Past — And Lawyers Need to Learn It
It’s a good thing that the cholera epidemic of 1854 didn’t arise today. By Judge Mizelle’s decision, the CDC would not have the power to close the well.

It’s a good thing that the cholera epidemic of 1854 didn’t arise today. By Judge Mizelle’s decision, the CDC would not have the power to close the well.

Even before the first wave peaked, doctors suggested the worst was over and that measures to control the virus were more dangerous than the virus itself.

This article looks at the COVID-19 pandemic response in Argentina, with a particular focus on the judicial control of public health policies.

By declaring the pandemic over by fiat, the government is giving up the fight when they should be redoubling their efforts.

The need for public health laws and policies that align with and reinforce civil rights protections is greater than ever.

We live in a non-ideal world and public health interventions must be designed and implemented with such imperfections in mind.

During the COVID-19 federal public health emergency, the sovereignty of the Native American Nations to protect their citizens was essential.

The public health establishment should take stock of itself and commit to better targeted and clearly justified employment of legal force.
