Fighting Diagnostic Discrimination and Stigma in Monkeypox
Amid the U.S. monkeypox outbreak, phlebotomists from Labcorp and Quest Diagnostics reportedly turned away blood samples for testing.

As we look ahead, both current and future pandemics will require tests that give us more granular information about disease.
This policy doesn’t seem to encourage frequent and convenient testing now, which is particularly important as we face the current delta surge.
At-home COVID-19 testing illustrates how even the most well-financed efforts can miss opportunities to ensure equity and expand access.
This post is part of our Eighth Annual Health Law Year in P/Review symposium. You can read all of the posts in the series here. Review the conference’s full agenda and register for the event on the Petrie-Flom Center’s website. By Jacob S. Sherkow For this year’s Health Law Year in P/Review, I’ll be talking…
By Timo Minssen New publication on the patentability of biomedical diagnostics out: Abstract: This brief comment complements Dan Burk’s excellent paper ( Dolly and Alice, J Law and the Biosciences (2015), 1–21, doi:10.1093/jlb/lsv042 ) by providing a very brief summary of the European approach regarding patents on medical diagnostic methods. This serves as the basis for…
By Timo Minssen I am happy to announce that on April 20th the New York attorney Robert M. Schwartz and I have filed an amicus brief at the US Supreme Court with Berkeley-based Andrew J. Dhuey as Counsel of Record. The brief, which was signed by 10 prominent European and Australian Law Professors as amici curiae, adds a…