A Brief History of Abortion Jurisprudence in the United States
This brief history of abortion rights and jurisprudence in the United States aims to clarify just what is at stake in Dobbs.

This brief history of abortion rights and jurisprudence in the United States aims to clarify just what is at stake in Dobbs.

2020 has been a notable year for reproductive rights. Watch panelists discuss these recent developments in a new video.

In Northern Ireland, abortion exceptionalism is evident in landmark developments to improve access, as well as in concerns over obstructions to services.

The African human rights system envisages a design and implementation of abortion law that is responsive to the imperatives of inclusive equality.

Even if FDA restrictions are untethered to medication abortion’s safety, they may not necessarily produce the type of obstacle at issue in June Medical.

In June Medical Services v. Russo, Chief Justice John Roberts felt curiously free to rewrite the very same precedents he claimed to respect.

U.S. abortion law is shaped by the idiosyncrasies of at least three power struggles playing out in particular ways in the American politico-legal landscape.

There is no other discipline in medicine in which our elected officials insert themselves to such a degree into our counseling and care of patients.

Going forward, Chief Justice Roberts’ concurring opinion could pave the way for federal courts to bless a host of abortion restrictions.

The June Medical and Alliance for Open Society decisions call into question the contemporary comparative relevance of U.S. abortion jurisprudence.
