The Pandemic Policy Excuse of ‘Meeting People Where They Are’
Even where interventions are unpopular, the pursuit of a just world cannot be reduced to a popularity contest.

Protecting the public’s health stands in direct conflict with the interests of those who fund elections and those who hold political power.

Despite recent Supreme Court rulings, the federal government still has considerable power to both lead and persuade.

Linguistically speaking, there are three reasons to reject the court’s analysis offered for striking down the CDC’s mask mandate.

Framing unclean air as a barrier in the built environment may help secure the benefit of indoor air quality standards.

Workplaces are, by and large, no longer safe for employees who are high-risk for serious illness or death from COVID-19.

This symposium aims to address the critical junctures of health, disability, and work at the heart of the domestic policy response to COVID-19.

Wearing masks in common, indoor spaces is such a small, easy, powerful act to help prevent the spread of disease.

Removing mask requirements means rejecting yet another public health tool to control the pandemic and protect our health care system.
