Preserving Meaningful External Review Despite Insurers’ Rulification of Medical Necessity
Insurers are increasingly crafting their coverage terms in ways that undermine a vital consumer protection.

Insurers are increasingly crafting their coverage terms in ways that undermine a vital consumer protection.

The Biden administration could use legislative overrides to address any number of incorrect judicial interpretations of federal health laws.

Senator Lisa Murkowski’s reintroduction of the Safe Step Act has revived the debate over the prudence of step therapy protocols.

In this post, I walk through three ways that many public option proposals would pave the way for single payer.

Revocations through the administrative process could undermine the stability of all waivers, but revocations through the CRA would not.

California v. Texas could have profound implications for the standards to which nonprofit hospitals are held.

Wendy Netter Epstein gives a preview of her paper, “Private Law Alternatives to the Individual Mandate,” which she will present on November 2.

Short-term, limited-duration insurance may be here to stay despite legal attacks, poor branding, and a potential Democrat victory in the upcoming election.

Commenters so far have raised various issues, including concerns about how the waiver would, if granted, impact access to treatment for mental illness.
